Real estate, alternative real assets and other diversions

The truth is we just don’t know what will happen on the Irish border The key Brexit players have contradicted themselves on the future of the Irish border

Political Insider

I’m going to admit something. I think it is something to which plenty of other people — in fact, most people in Westminster — would admit to if were they being honest.

If in 81 days the United Kingdom leaves the European Union without a deal, I have little in the way of certainty about what happens on the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

My instinct is that very little will happen on day one. The days before any no deal scenario would be chaotic and a media frenzy. The gazebo threat level in Westminster would reach an unprecedented triple decker. But what about on March 30th?

Well, frankly, there have been no preparations by the British, the Irish, or any third party groups, to enforce a border on the isle of Ireland. And so, on the first day after Britain has left the EU, there’s very little reason to suggest that anything would be different. I expect that news reports will be filled with cars and lorries driving across the border with absolutely nothing stopping them. If a zealous Garda or PSNI officer stops hauliers and says their licences or haulage permits aren’t valid I’d expect short shrift from politicians (although I don’t rule idiocy out). I expect there will be people on TV standing near the Irish border telling reporters: “I don’t know what all the fuss was about.”

But such a state of affairs would not necessarily last, and that’s the danger of no deal on the Irish border.

If I think that, why do I say that I don’t know what will happen? Because there is so much conflicting news from every single side.

In November, Irish Taoiseach Leo Varadkar said his government would find it very difficult to avoid imposing a hard border on Northern Ireland if Britain crashes out of the European Union without an exit agreement. Then in December he said that he’s not planning for a border at all, and that his government would not be making any.

He has previously said that the United Kingdom would have to implement a hard border due to the rules of the World Trade Organisation. The UK has said it won’t implement a hard border, but then Philip Hammond in October said that the United Kingdom would have to. In Parliament in October, Theresa May herself said that the UK was committed to no hard border in any circumstances, including no deal.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the EU Commission President, promised to the Irish Parliament that no hard border would follow, even in the event of no deal. But then Merkel ally Joachim Pfeiffer reminded EU officials that Ireland’s ascension to EU rules means it has signed up to regulatory checks and collection of tariffs with any third party state — warning that no deal means Ireland is facing the hardest possible border arrangements in Europe (or the hardest possible sanction for non-enforcement). So we’re left with the question of how much political promises mean against the reality of treaty law.

And last week we learnt that 1,000 extra police have been ordered to be sent to Northern Ireland to reinforce the PSNI for any disorder arising from a Hard Brexit and a hard border.

So, will there be one? Well, the World Trade Organisation doesn’t seem to think so. In fact, the WTO would only be involved in the event that there is a dispute between one of its 164 member countries (including the EU). In other words, it would require either the UK or the EU or a third country to bring a case of dispute to the WTO arising from a lack of a border between Northern Ireland and the Republic.

If that dispute did come up, brought up by either the UK or the EU or a third party of either, then it would require either the UK or the EU to implement a hard border, or face sanction.

As Peter Ungphakorn has pointed out before, the commonly held belief that Ireland or the UK would go head-to-head with WTO officials in a heroic stand to maintain a soft-border in the event of no-deal, is false. That is not going to happen because that isn’t how WTO disputes work and there isn’t a specific rule requiring governments to secure their borders.

There is though a requirement for non-discrimination between member states where there is no treaty in place — which is, of course, what no deal means.

When the UK leaves it is a third party and countries that export into the EU could dispute with the EU that allowing goods from the UK into the RoI (and rest of the Single Market and Customs Union) without checks could constitute discrimination. And other states could argue that checks to enter GB and Northern Ireland without checks from the Republic could be discriminatory.

And these are quite explicit. The UK adopting the whole of the Community acquis on day one (which is already on its way) means that we’ll still be checking live animals, animal products, agricultural products, and other Rules of Origin requirements, at ports. But we won’t with goods going across the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic. Both the UK and the EU will be easy targets for dispute and other countries probably will not hesitate to take advantage of this.

Our Partners