Mike Ashley is right about the dying high street, but wrong about the solution – The Property Chronicle
Select your region of interest:

Real estate, alternative real assets and other diversions

Mike Ashley is right about the dying high street, but wrong about the solution We should not cheer shops going under, but their demise is also an opportunity

The Economist

More news of Britain’s declining high street, with a Northumbria University study suggesting more than a quarter of Britain’s retail space has been abandoned since the 2008 financial crash.

There are a few reasons for this change, not all of them especially negative. First there’s the post-crash economic downturn, with its commensurate hit on disposable income and consumption. That we can certainly file under unequivocally bad news.

But while the crisis may have accelerated the demise of some shops – the likes of Woolworth’s spring to mind – it was likely more of a catalyst for the well-documented shift to shopping online. Indeed, for a retailer starting life in 2018, it is far from a given that they would need or want physical premises to hawk their wares.

Along with innovative ways of doing business and not needing physical premises, the likes of Amazon gain a big advantage thanks to the pernicious system of business rates, which online retailers are not subject to.

It’s this inequity that has led Sports Direct boss Mike Ashley, a man vying with Philip Green for the role of Britain’s least loved retail mogul, to suggest levelling the playing field. Appearing before MPs yesterday, Ashley grimly declared that the “mainstream high streets as we think about [them] today… are already dead”. His solution, if that’s the right word, is to levy a 20% tax on online sales. It’s nothing if not magnanimous, given his own company does some £400m of online sales.

Ashley’s preferred policy fix may be shared by many retailers, but he gets things the wrong way round. After all, taxes on sales will ultimately wind up as higher prices, with the extra load born not by the big bad companies, but by the little person paying more. Given that many people shop online as much for convenience as price, such a tax might not even change behaviour that much.






Subscribe to our print magazine now!

SUBSCRIBE