2020: year of destiny, year of peril – The Property Chronicle
Select your region of interest:

Real estate, alternative real assets and other diversions

2020: year of destiny, year of peril

The Economist

What a difference a year makes! And why should the calendar matter so much, if at all? Many investors began 2019 with their performance in shreds, bracing for the worst. They finished 2019 boasting that global stock markets had posted their best year since the aftermath of the financial crisis a decade ago, as investors shrugged off trade tensions and warnings of slowing growth in major economies. The MSCI World Index, which tracks stocks across the developed world, jumped by almost 24 per cent during 2019 – the strongest performance since 2009. A surge in US technology giants and a strong recovery in eurozone and Asian stocks drove the rally. So, 2020 will be more of the same?

That isn’t the view here at Economic Perspectives. We’re in the business of bounded reality, not unbounded optimism. We envisage that 2020 will be the year when chickens come home to roost, reminding us of unresolved problems, unsatisfactory remedies and unstable politics. 

The good news, possibly, is that national governments and their agencies remain dead set against an end to this mature, yet faltering, global economic expansion. The bad news is that the global credit system has an infection which is spreading rapidly, with life-threatening implications for the global economy. We expect the early year hopes of cyclical recovery to be overtaken in short order by the unintended consequences of long-standing lax credit and monetary policies.      

Over the course of the past 12 months, the US Federal Reserve has become an embattled institution, whose policy responses have diverged substantially from those of an independent monetary authority. The Fed’s supposed independence has been challenged in four dimensions. First, by the US president who has spent the past 2 years criticising Fed decisions, questioning its motives, undermining its authority and launching ad hominem attacks on its chairman. Second, by the Chinese Communist Party, that has demonstrated its power to destabilise the US traded goods economy and the US Treasury bond market. Third, by the “debt vigilantes”, who warn that higher interest rates will crush the economy. Fourth, by the “financial plumbers”, who warn that failure to resume QE, let alone any attempt to revoke past QE will have disastrous consequences for financial stability, in the context of complex new financial regulations. 

The Fed has responded as any embattled institution would, to protect its reputation, to forge new friendships and alliances and to avoid making difficult and controversial choices. Sadly, it has doubled down on Yellen’s model-based mission to “run the economy hot”, in an attempt to send ripples of prosperity towards “left-behind” communities and win the plaudits of the liberal media. However, the Fed’s new-sworn oath to “first, do no harm” should be understood as a myopic and tunnelled vision. It betrays an unwillingness to acknowledge how hot certain parts of the labour market are already and, more seriously, how damaging another episode of financial instability would be to growth and living standards. The Fed, ECB and Bank of Japan are toying with further easing measures, especially balance sheet expansion, in the misguided belief that they can fight the credit infection by boosting financial asset prices and making credit even more readily available.

At our October seminar, ‘The coming collapse of corporate credit’, we laid out our thesis of the bifurcation of credit pricing. Elite and highly profitable corporations will continue to enjoy full benefit from the repression of nominal interest rates by central banks, because their borrowings are priced off the government yield curve. By contrast, other segments of the corporate sector will suffer rising borrowing costs and diminishing credit access as their creditworthiness is reassessed based on revised perceptions of default risk. In our December Global Credit Perspective, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the leverage of the US quoted company sector, finding extensive balance sheet fragility of medium- and small-cap listed companies and disturbing leverage trends in the consumer, healthcare, IT and utilities sectors. As the credit infection spreads through the global corporate sector, business confidence will evaporate; hiring and investment intentions will dissipate. 






The Economist

About Peter Warburton

Peter Warburton

Dr Peter Warburton is director of Economic Perspectives Ltd, an international consultancy, and managing director of Halkin Services Ltd. He was economist to Ruffer LLP, an investment management company, for 15 years and spent a similar length of time in the City as economic advisor and UK economist for the investment bank Robert Fleming and at Lehman Brothers. Previously, he was an economic researcher, forecaster and lecturer at the London Business School and what is now the Cass Business School. He published Debt and Delusion in 1999. He has been a member of the IEA’s Shadow Monetary Policy Committee since its inception in 1997. He is a contributor to the Practical History of Financial Markets course run by Didasko, an education company, at Edinburgh University, and teaches occasionally at Cardiff Business School.

Articles by Peter Warburton

Subscribe to our print magazine now!

SUBSCRIBE